I read a post on a forum for people with service dogs the
other day that I found really troubling.
The poster was saying how her service dog in training was smarter than
she’d thought. She’d discovered her
dog’s intelligence recently as she was driving along and her dog jumped from
the back seat into the front seat and began barking and bugging her. She didn’t know why her dog was behaving that
way but she finally pulled over onto the side of the road to try to figure it
out.
No sooner had she pulled over, when she passed out. She thinks it was due to a rapid and
significant drop in blood sugar. She
woke up to her dog licking her face. She
had a granola bar in the car for just such occasions so she ate it and felt
better. She was delighted that her dog
had alerted her that her blood sugar was dropping. She seemed to think she was telling a story
about what a wonderful dog she had.
I was horrified. If
her blood sugar drops so much so fast that she passes out before she realizes
what’s happening, she shouldn’t be driving a car.
I have a condition called reactive hypoglycemia, which means
that sometimes my blood sugar spikes and then crashes. Most of the time I control it by watching
what I eat. If I eat too many carbs
without enough protein, my sugar is likely to crash. There have been times it’s been very, very
low, as low as 37. I’m surprised I was
able to stand up, walk to my kitchen, fetch my glucometer, and test my sugar
that time. But I’ve never passed out
from it. I can tell when it’s dropping
and I know what to do when that happens.
I eat something that contains some sugar and some protein, like a
protein bar. I don’t believe driving is
dangerous for me because I have always recognized what was happening before
passing out and if I am driving when it happens, I eat something immediately.
But this woman apparently does not recognize the symptoms of
her sugar dropping. She’s happy with the
idea that her dog can tell her if it’s happening so that she can pull the car
off the road before she passes out and wrecks her car, but she was also
surprised that her dog was able to do that.
So she was driving without the expectation that her dog would alert her
if necessary. She was putting herself in
danger, putting her dog in danger, and putting everyone else on the road in
danger. Apparently she sees nothing
wrong with that.
When some other members of the forum expressed concern about
her driving, she explained that she doesn’t drive alone because it’s not safe. She only drives when her dog or her husband
is with her. She did not explain whether
or not her husband also alerts her to drops in her blood sugar, like her dog
does. I’m thinking he probably does not,
in which case I’m not sure why she thinks it’s OK to drive if he’s with
her. She’s just endangering him
then. And again, she seemed surprised
that her dog alerted her to the drop in blood sugar, so I don’t understand why
she had been feeling safe to drive if the dog was with her.
Even if her dog does prove able to reliably alert her to
changes in glucose levels (and alerting her one time does not prove he can do
it reliably), it sounds risky to me to rely on a dog to do that when you’re
driving. If the dog makes a mistake,
which could happen, and she passes out behind the wheel, both she and her dog
could be killed. So could other people
on the road. I was just amazed that she
thought all this was OK.
No comments:
Post a Comment